Controversial “Golden Passport” (or visa) schemes are again underneath the highlight as one main London firm opens up on the “huge boom” in demand for its offerings.

Luke Hexter, handling director of Knightsbridge Capital Partners, informed Forbes that their European Passport program turned into using 70% 12 months-on-12 months boom on the company. This comes after Knightsbridge became embroiled in a Sunday Times and Channel Four investigation that observed firms brokering U.K. Funding visas and European passports for foreign billionaires and millionaires had boasted of being able to sidestep authorities checks and safeguards for his or her customers.

Knightsbridge currently sells passports from Cyprus, which might deliver a foreign investors and their households the proper to journey visa-unfastened to 163 nations, in return for a $2.2 million (€2 million) funding into nearby property or budget. The island has raked in $7.4 billion (€6.6 billion) from promoting passports, however the scheme has also attracted the ire of the European Commision and OECD.

Economic growth and political instability in rising markets created the demand for thus-referred to as Golden Passport investment applications, in keeping with Hexter. “If you purchased a few billion–a whole lot of these customers may have citizenship in a single us of a, passports in every other and residency some place else as a way to mitigate threat,” says Hexter

“Nigeria is a prime instance of a rustic wherein plenty of people are becoming very wealthy pretty quick. But with the political instability, they still love their united states of america … they just nonetheless want to have a contingency plan in area,” he delivered. Nigeria is currently ranked by means of campaign organization Transparency International as one of the global’s most corrupt countries with tens of billions from its oil fields looted by its political and army elite.

Hexter struck a protecting tone on whether the Golden Passport industry and his firm helped criminals to flee justice and conceal their ill-gotten profits. The industry can “get a little bit of flack for pandering to certain unscrupulous excessive-internet-worth people,” the accusation is, “as far faraway from the fact as may be viable.”

Knightsbridge Capital, he says, “would not contact” what he describes as, “a politically uncovered man or woman or someone in which there’s even a query that their wealth could have been acquired illegally.” He provides his company’s patron tests (KYC) are “stringent” and the EU’s due diligence are “very very strict.”


However, for those preventing international corruption, these citizen by means of funding schemes are not as benign because the London companies worried might have you trust.

Ben Cowdock, senior studies officer at Transparency International, challenges whether or not British and European money laundering and historical past tests are effective in identifying corrupt enterprise leaders and politicians.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *